The male genitalia are if you think about it the ultimate expression of the primitive male psyche. A rampant cock and the balls attached to it scream out the owner’s fertility and one of their primary functions as members of the species – to fertilise the female’s ovum and thus ensure the survival of the species.
It does explain a lot about even the modern man’s propensity to become a little cock fixated. From the moment we are born guys are conscious of their cocks. As they grow older the size of their penis and how often it gets used becomes part of our thought processes. Not all men think with their cocks all of their time but the penis and associated urges are in charge enough to make us easily manipulated at times and just plain dumb at other. It also means that we can be very single minded in pursuit of some things, usually sex of one sort or another.
I wonder how different it would have been if the woman had the penis and drew sperm out of a male vagina? An odd thought I know. Odder still if you consider how it would have affected art, culture and society in general. And how would men have shown off? Would they have been proud of a tight “mangina” or an easily accessible capacious one?
Actually, should it be man-pussy as the word mangina has already been appropriated for other uses.
What do you mean you’ve never heard it … well if a guy tucks his cock and balls between his legs so they aren’t visible you have a mangina. Urban dictionary has more definitions but this is the one I’m familiar with.