![\"Mr](\"\/images\/mr-and-mrs-smith.jpg\")
Inglorious Basterds is one of those movies that we want to go and see and yet keep being told by the critics that it is a bit pants.<\/p>\nInglorious Basterds is one of those movies that we want to go and see and yet keep being told by the critics that it is a bit pants.<\/p>\n
We were always sceptical about Quentin Tarantino – too much hype around Reservoir Dogs – until that is we saw pulp fiction, then went back through the films he’d done and caught up on a couple. First Reservoir Dogs, then Jackie brown and picking up on Dusk Til Dawn on the way.<\/p>\n
The thing about Tarantino is that he loves film. He loves the movie business. This is a double-edged sword. It means he’s great at invoking the cinema of the past but he’s also occasionally self-indulgent and therefore often a bit of an arse.<\/p>\n
It looks like Inglorious Basterds might be like that. We want to love it. Suze wants to see Brad pit in an army uniform so she can drool a bit and get some masturbation fantasies bank, but it could be real pants.<\/p>\n
All that said porn ought to take a leaf out of Tarantino’s book. Inglorious Basterds is a remake of a 1970s film. There are loads of films that are ripe for the porn treatment. OK, I know there have been numerous “porn version” of well-known titles, but frankly they take the name, add a few vaguely appropriate costumes and then shoot the movie.<\/p>\n
Porn deserves a bit of thought to invoke the really horny bits of films of the past. It should explore the sexually charged scenes like the chess game in the Thomas Crown Affair , the bit in Mr And Mrs Smith where they try to kill each other and the edited love scene in Star Wars episode 4 between Han Solo and Luke \u2026 OK I made the last one up but now I’m distracted thinking about a silver suited Jollie in Tomb Raider.<\/p>\n
Porn ought to be more referential to popular culture and I don’t mean just stealing and mutilating the titles of the film.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"