Sarah Palin Porn Movie

8 thoughts on “Sarah Palin Porn Movie”

1. Sarah Palin is an American vice-presidential candidate. How do English people even know about her, let alone care? I’m fairly well-informed, but I couldn’t name a single person in the English government besides Gordon Brown, and I wouldn’t consider doing a post on my blog about a Gordon Brown porn video.

2. Svetlana, What an odd thing to say. The rest of the world know a great deal about US politics and to a greater or lesser extent the political systems of the rest of the world.

   Why limit yourself to writing about just your own country when there’s a whole globe full of posibilities?

   Believe me, I don’t think there would be a market for a Gordon Brown porn video LOL. Then again one thing four years of blogging has taught me is that just because it doesn’t float my boat you can’t assume someone else might find Gordon the hottest guy in Westminster.

3. I find it odd that the rest of the world knows a good deal about U.S. politics. Even most Americans don’t follow U.S. politics. (50% don’t vote at all even in presidential elections.)

   I know the leaders of a lot of countries, but I’m uninterested in those countries’ domestic politics, which is where Sarah Palin’s candidacy falls. She’s a state governor who is a candidate for higher office, but, until she attains that office, it’s odd to me that other nationalities (except possibly Canadians) would have an interest in her.

   Is it just because she’s a woman?

4. Svetlana

   The post is about the ability of pornographers to make porn about anything and their constant search for topical and interest-generating material. It occurs to me to ask the question “If the Internet had been around in the early sixties, would the same pornographers have made movies with Jackie Kennedy look-alikes?” Given the reverence for the Kennedy dynasty that much of the US still seems to have I doubt it. Granted she was first lady and Palin’s a VP candidate, but she was the face at JFK’s side and therefore the most prominent woman in the US at the time.

   The world is interested in Palin not because she’s a woman specifically but because this is a pivotal election. If The McCain/Palin ticket succeeds you’ll have the first female VP in the history of your country. If the democrats prevail you’ll have a black president, something that I would not have even though possible until this year.

   As I write this the “terrorist” accusations unleashed by the republicans against Obama seem to be backfiring as McCain has had to defend Obama’s integrity so as not to be seen to be condoning the increasingly hostile and apparently racist comments being made by some of McCain’s supporters.

   In Palin’s case her investigation over her alleged capriciousness around the case of her state trooper ex-brother in-law could see her McCain’s biggest liability. The news today, that the investigation seems to criticise her actions, is not what the Republicans want to hear.

   But four weeks is a very long time in politics – who knows what will happen.

   Whichever side prevails this is an historic election for the US, and that’s why the world is interested in the result. Iraq, North Korea, the rise of China a dominant economic power, climate change and the current financial chaos mean that whoever wins is going to have an arduous term in office.

5. I can understand an interest in U.S. policy as it relates to your country – just not in the machinations of U.S. electoral politics . Anyone who thinks Obama’s policies are much different than McCain’s hasn’t been paying attention to the right things. Obama is more pleasant to listen to and look at and not crazy, but, otherwise, he and McCain are cut from the same Establishment cloth.

   BTW, Colin Powell would have had an excellent chance of unseating Bill Clinton in 1996, and I think he would have been a successful president in the Eisenhower mold.

6. There’s very little room for maneouver when it comes to policy making in the world at the moment. The restrictions in terms of foreign policy, monetary and fiscal policy imposed by the world situation mean that differences between parties of any political hue are subtle and often indistinguishable.

7. “he and McCain are cut from the same Establishment cloth” – errr well one is republican and one democrat so… basically your totally wrong. You also claim to be “fairly well-informed” yet can only name 1 person in the English government. This doesnt make much sense to me…

   However it is true that the UK takes great interest in world politics, probably more so than any other country in the world. I think in contrast the majority of Americans have virtually no interest in world politics simply because there is an over riding belief that the US is always at the top of everything so why would they need to, right?

   You say 50% dont vote in presidential elections. I can believe that. Especially when you know 75% of Americans dont even own a passport.

   How is it people from England can be interested in Mrs Palin, Mrs Sarkozy and Mrs Brown in perhaps equal measure, but as you suggest most people from America can barely cope with Mrs Palin? I dont know, but its certainly not something you can complain about as if its odd. It just makes English people look brainy and informed and people like you less so.

   In conclusion then: Whens the porno out?

8. Sarah Palin does have a rather large supporter base. Its hilarious when some of them are interviewed and cannot explain why they support her. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/23/palin-supporters-struggle_n_367800.html

Comments are closed.